The Uluru Statement from the Heart was issued by the 250 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander delegates gathered at the 2017 First Nations National Constitutional Convention in Uluru, on Aṉangu land in the Northern Territory in May 2017. The conversation at Uluru built on six months of discussions held around the country where Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples considered five options presented in the Referendum Council’s discussion paper. The Referendum Council was jointly appointed by the Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten on 7 December 2015. The Referendum Council’s job is to advise the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition on progress and next steps towards constitutional reform.
At Uluru in May 2017 and before in consultations conducted by the Referendum Council, when asked what constitutional recognition means to them, First Nations peoples told the Referendum Council they don’t want recognition if it means a simple acknowledgement, but rather constitutional reform that makes a real difference in their communities.
AssignmentTutorOnline
Assignment questions
The case of Kartinyeri v Commonwealth (1998) 195 CLR 337 (‘Kartinyeri’) is the leading High Court case on the interpretation of section 51(xxvi) of the Constitution in its application to the Indigenous people of Australia.
(a) Explain the interpretive question concerning the application of section 51(xxvi) to Indigenous people that the High Court had to resolve in Kartinyeri.
The Uluru Statement from the Heart, made on 26 May 2017,
call[s] for the establishment of a First Nations Voice enshrined in the Constitution.
Following this, in its Final Report, the Referendum Council recommended:
That a referendum be held to provide in the Australian Constitution for a representative body that gives Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander First Nations a Voice to the Commonwealth Parliament. One of the specific functions of such a body, to be set out in legislation outside the Constitution, should include the function of monitoring the use of the [head] of power in section 51 (xxvi) …
(b) Suppose that a successful referendum resulted in a change to the Constitution and the establishment of a First Nations Voice to advise Parliament on law-making with respect to Indigenous affairs, as called for in the Uluru Statement from the Heart and the Final Report of the Referendum Council. Would, or should, this make any difference to the interpretation of laws enacted under section 51(xxvi) that apply to Indigenous people
The post conversation at Uluru appeared first on My Blog.