Sample Answer for NU 665B Week 4 Assignment 1: Comprehensive Case Study Included After Question
Value: 100 points
Due: Day 7
Gradebook Category: Assignments – Comprehensive Case Studies
Introduction
For this assignment, you will be completing an interactive case study electronically. You will progress through a patient case much like you would in practice. You will need to make decisions for your patient as you complete the case and provide a rationale for your answers and decisions. You will have one attempt to complete this assignment, which must be completed in one sitting.
Once you have completed your comprehensive case study, save your summary and then upload it to the drop box for grading.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
To Submit Your Assignment:
Select the Add Submissions button.
Drag or upload your file to the File Picker.
Select Save Changes.
Add submission
Submission status
Submission statusNo submissions have been made yetGrading statusNot gradedTime remaining23 days 11 hours remaining
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NU 665B Week 4 Assignment 1: Comprehensive Case Study
Title: NU 665B Week 4 Assignment 1: Comprehensive Case Study
Comprehensive Case Study Rubric
CriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsApproach to Patient CareApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 0 errors.
10 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.
7 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.
5 pointsApproach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.
3 points10Differential Diagnoses (Including Problems)All required differential diagnoses and problems are included (including worst case) and fully supported by findings.
Rationale for all differential diagnoses provided.
20 pointsMost required differential diagnoses and/or problems are included (including worst case); one is not supported by findings.
Rationale for most differential diagnoses provided.
18 pointsSome required differential diagnoses or problems are included (not including worst case); two are not fully supported by findings.
Rationale for some differential diagnoses provided.
14 pointsFew required differential diagnoses or problems are included; more than two are not fully supported by findings.
Rationale provided for few differential diagnoses.
9 points20Case Specific questions and RationaleLogical and systematic organization of data.
Rationale provided for all answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 0 errors.
Correct terminology, spelling, and grammar.
20 pointsLogical and systematic organization of data.
Rationale provided for most answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.
Terminology, spelling or grammar errors (1–3).
15 pointsMinor errors in organization of data.
Rationale provided for some answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.
Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (4–6).
11 pointsDisorganized flow of data.
Rationale provided for few answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.
Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (>6).
6 points20PlanComprehensive plan includes all components with no errors:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNonpharmacologic intervention ReferralsFollow-up
50 pointsPlan missing 1 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNonpharmacologic intervention ReferralsFollow-up
40 pointsPlan missing 2 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNonpharmacologic intervention ReferralsFollow-up
30 pointsPlan missing >3 of the identified components and/or has safety Concerns or is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.:Diagnostic testingPharmacologic interventionNonpharmacologic intervention ReferralsFollow-up
20 points50Total Points100