Studyportal

Being an Effective Agile Coach Leader Project

Order ID# 45178248544XXTG457	Plagiarism Level: 0-0.5%	Writer Classification: PhD competent
Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago	Delivery: Minimum 3 Hours	Revision: Permitted
Sources: 4-6	Course Level: Masters/University College	Guarantee Status: 96-99%

Instructions

Being an Effective Agile Coach Leader Project

Being, Effective, Agile, Coach, Leader, Project

Preparation

Determining how to build a high-performing Agile team while managing conflicts is a considerable task for any Agile coach/leader. In this assignment, you are asked to explore and discuss various conflict resolution methods and determine when and how to use them as an Agile coach/leader.

You must discuss the techniques in the context of an Agile project team environment with various scenarios and must also demonstrate approaches to turning the high-contention situations into high-collaboration situations.

For example, the project team has consistently encountered changes of scope from the product owner. The QA team also emailed the whole team on how poorly the developers have done in their coding. The developers escalated to their manager about the documentation errors from the architects.

Instructions

Write a 5–6-page paper in which you:

1. Identify and evaluate at least three conflict resolution techniques that can be used by the agile coach/leader to change the dynamics of the team in the example provided.
2. Speculate on two common causes of conflicts in teams. Suggest two approaches that agile coach/leaders can take in order to mitigate or prevent these conflicts.
3. Analyze the major pros and cons of two conflict resolution techniques. Determine at least three different situations (e.g., levels of conflicts) where these conflict resolution techniques would be useful.
4. Suggest at least three strategies an Agile coach/leader can employ to use conflict to propel team members to achieve higher performance.
5. Recommend at least five best practices for collaboration and cooperation within agile teams. Support each best practice recommendation with one example of collaboration within agile teams.
6. Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. You may use the resources above or others of your choosing.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course outcome associated with this assignment is:

Promote team and stakeholder participation and collaboration throughout the project lifecycle

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
or Being an Effective Agile Coach Leader Project

Being an Effective Agile Coach Leader Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!