DO NOT SUMMARIZE!!!!!!!! ARGUE YOUR IDEA!!!!! ONLY USE THE CHAPTERS WE HAVE BEEN READING FROM ONLY THE BOOK!!!!!
The Argumentative Paper is aimed at evaluating what you have learned about the theories of Ethics, and your ability to evaluate and apply systems of thought.
Briefly list the Pro’s and Cons for each of the three perspectives on Ethics that we studied in Module D (Aristotle, Epictetus and Mill), and then argue for which one you think is the best.
The point of the paper is for me to see how you can understand and evaluate the assigned readings in this Module. You must engage the assigned readings in this class, do not use the videos or sources other than those readings assigned in this text for this Module. Keep the evaluation (pros and cons) of the two you did not choose rather brief, and concentrate on the one you chose as best and go into greater detail on that choice. Even if you have another option, or find none of them “best” or what to say the best is a blend of several theories, I want to see how well you can evaluate the assigned material, so do choose one and argue for it – even if it isn’t your favorite. Also, DO NOT USE ANY SOURCE OTHER THAN OUR TEXT AND ASSIGNED READINGS THEREIN (in other words, write only on the 3 thinkers mentioned in the question above as they are printed in our assigned text from the pages that are assigned in the course)
Uploading: The dropbox is set for file upload. Please use a Word Doc, or PDF – Google Docs, Pages, and other formats are iffy. Please don’t send something to me that I have to seek permission to open.
The post DO NOT SUMMARIZE!!!!!!!! ARGUE YOUR IDEA!!!!! ONLY USE THE CHAPTERS WE HAVE BEEN first appeared on Elite Writers.
The post DO NOT SUMMARIZE!!!!!!!! ARGUE YOUR IDEA!!!!! ONLY USE THE CHAPTERS WE HAVE BEEN appeared first on Elite Writers.
