QUESTION

The document below shows which group’s project you are assigned to review
and you will submit a generative critique that addresses the following prompts.
You can respond in a written document (500–700 words), a slide deck, a 1-page
zine-style visual, or another creative format of your choice. You will be graded
based on the rubric (below).
1. Understanding the Root Cause
What problem is this group trying to address?
What do you understand to be the root causes? Are they clearly identified?
What’s one insight you gained from how this group framed the issue?
2. Stakeholder Complexity
Whose interests were most considered in their analysis?
Who seems underrepresented or missing from their stakeholder map? Explain why this
matters.
Pose one thoughtful question about power, influence, or accountability among
stakeholders.
3. Creative Intervention as Experiment
What intervention did they propose? What stands out about it?
What do you think is brilliant, bold, or risky about their approach?
If you could tweak or expand this idea, what would you suggest? Why?

SOLUTION

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

Step-by-Step Guide for Structuring and Writing Your Generative Critique (500–700 words)

Step 1: Understand the Assignment Format

Decide on your format early:

Written document (most straightforward)
Slide deck (visual + concise text)
1-page zine (creative layout, visual emphasis)
Another creative format (e.g., video or infographic)

For this guide, we’ll focus on writing a 500–700 word document, which can easily be adapted into other formats.

Step 2: Read and Analyze the Group Project

Thoroughly review the assigned group’s project.
Take notes while reviewing, especially:
- What issue they are addressing
- Who is involved (stakeholders)
- What intervention is being proposed

Step 3: Organize Your Response Using the Prompts

Section 1: Understanding the Root Cause

State the problem the group is trying to solve in your own words.
Identify the root causes as the group presented them. Did they name systemic issues? Cultural? Economic?
Evaluate clarity: Were those root causes clearly explained?
Insight gained: What is one perspective or framing from the group that helped you understand the issue in a new way?

Example sentence starter:
“The group addressed the issue of [problem]. They identified root causes such as [cause 1] and [cause 2], which helped reveal how deeply embedded the problem is in [context]. A compelling insight I gained was…”

Section 2: Stakeholder Complexity

Who was considered? Describe which stakeholders were central to the group’s analysis. (e.g., students, policymakers, families)
Who was missing? Consider marginalized groups, or voices that typically lack power—why does their absence matter?
Pose a critical question: Reflect on power dynamics. Ask something that challenges the assumptions or invites deeper thinking about influence or accountability.

Example sentence starter:
“While the group highlighted the perspectives of [stakeholders], I noticed that [missing group] was not as thoroughly included. This matters because…”

“A question that came to mind while reviewing their stakeholder analysis is: How might [group] be empowered to influence outcomes directly?”

Section 3: Creative Intervention as Experiment

Describe the proposed intervention. What is it and who does it serve?
Highlight what’s bold, brilliant, or risky: Is the idea pushing boundaries? Taking on taboo issues? Using an unconventional method?
Suggest a refinement or expansion: Offer a constructive addition or shift—how could the impact grow?

Example sentence starter:
“The proposed intervention—a [brief description]—stood out for its [creativity/practicality/scale]. What felt particularly bold was…”

“If I were to expand their idea, I would suggest [tweak or addition], because…”

Step 4: Conclude With Reflection (Optional but Strong)

Wrap up with a brief reflection on what you appreciated most about the project or how it changed your thinking.

Step 5: Proofread and Align with Rubric

Check your word count (500–700 words).
Make sure each section addresses all parts of the prompt.
Review the grading rubric if provided—align your response accordingly.

Tips from Your Tutor:

Be generous but honest—your critique should aim to support growth and spark thought, not just praise or judge.
Use respectful, thoughtful language.
Engage deeply—your ideas should build on theirs, not just summarize.

The post Strong Generative Critique of a Group Project appeared first on Skilled Papers.