Instructions for the Article Review

Locate a peer-reviewed article (related to the course content) published within the last 12 months in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present at least a 15 (title and reference slides do not count) slide power point presentation assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article. Use bulletized statements on your slides and then put within the notes what you would say as if you were presenting the article to the class. Remember the reader would not see the notes section so your slides need to have the proper title of what the slides is going to discuss. Refer the the attached rubrics. When completing this assignment follow the slide titles as they appear below or within the grading rubrics. This are the slides with the titles and information that we are looking for. Please review and asked any questions your have before your turn in.

Title slide – with the standard title page information

Introductory Slide — Discuss the author’s thesis. Include article and author name in this paragraph. -1 slide

The Facts – discuss three important facts the author uses to support thesis. – 3 slides

Explain or correlate the facts with facts from course content. – another 3 slides or put in the facts from the article slides

Use in text citation from course reading to show connections to this article.

Evaluate the resources provided with the article. – 1 slide

Are their resources provided with the article? Are they recent? – 1 to 2 slides

Strengths /Weaknesses/Discussion to the profession – Describe the strengths of the information presented as it applies to the professions. Critically evaluate the information in the article. – up to 3 slides

Is there bias or faulty reasoning? Evaluate the information for truth. – 1 to 2 slides

Bring in outside sources to support your analysis and review. – 1 slide

What are others saying about the same topic? – 1 slide

You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning. – 1 slide

Conclusions – Provide concluding remarks regarding your review/evaluation of the article. – 1 slide

Reference Slide

APA 7th edition formatting, in-text citations and referencing will be needed for more than one reference.

This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related to the course content). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to condense someone else’s lengthy argument into a concise report; to think critically about what has been read by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become participants in the discussions regarding the Supply Chain and Logistics profession.

Struggling with where to start this assignment? Follow this guide to tackle your assignment easily!

This assignment requires you to conduct a critical evaluation of a peer-reviewed article in your course’s field. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you structure your PowerPoint presentation effectively.

Step 1: Title Slide

Title of your article: Ensure the title clearly identifies the article you’re reviewing.
Author(s): List the author(s) of the article.
Your name: Add your full name.
Course information: Include the course name, instructor’s name, and the date.

Step 2: Introductory Slide

Discuss the author’s thesis:
- State the central argument or thesis of the article.
- Mention the article name and author in this slide.
- Example: “In this article titled X, author Y argues that… The central thesis of the article revolves around…”
Keep the text brief in the slide (bullet points), but expand on it in your Speaker Notes section where you will explain it in more detail.

Step 3: The Facts – Three Important Facts from the Article

Fact #1:
- Summarize an important fact presented by the author. Bullet it out for clarity.
- Speaker Notes: Discuss how this fact supports the thesis and its importance to the article.
Fact #2:
- Another key fact or data point from the article.
- Speaker Notes: Explain how this fact enhances the overall argument of the article.
Fact #3:
- The third significant fact from the article.
- Speaker Notes: Explain its relevance and how it contributes to the overall conclusion of the article.

Step 4: Correlating the Facts with Course Content

Slide #1 – Fact 1: Relate the first fact to your course material.
- Use in-text citations from your course readings to show how the article’s argument ties to what you’ve learned in class.
- Example: According to [Course Author], this is similar to…
Slide #2 – Fact 2: Connect the second fact with a concept from the course.
- Again, use course materials to show alignment or contrast.
Slide #3 – Fact 3: Link the third fact to a relevant course theory or concept.
- Provide in-text citations from course readings to show how the article’s findings align or differ with what you have studied.

Step 5: Evaluate the Resources in the Article

Slide: Discuss the quality of the resources used in the article.
- Do the references seem credible?
- Are they recent or outdated?
- Example: “The author relies heavily on studies from the 1990s, which may impact the relevancy of the findings in today’s context.”
- Speaker Notes: Go deeper into the quality of the sources. Are there any major flaws in the research or lack of updated information?

Step 6: Strengths / Weaknesses / Discussion to the Profession

Strengths:
- Highlight the strong aspects of the article, such as robust research, clear argumentation, or practical application to your field.
- Example: “One strength of the article is its comprehensive analysis of supply chain strategies, providing clear, actionable recommendations.”
Weaknesses:
- Critically evaluate the article’s weaknesses or limitations. Were there any flaws in methodology or missing perspectives?
- Example: “One weakness is the lack of global supply chain considerations in the author’s research.”
Discussion to the Profession:
- Discuss how the article contributes to the Supply Chain field or profession.
- Example: “This article adds value to the profession by introducing new models for logistics management that can improve operational efficiency.”

Step 7: Is There Bias or Faulty Reasoning?

Slide: Evaluate whether the article presents any biases or faulty reasoning.
- Is the article one-sided, or does it consider multiple perspectives?
- Example: “The article seems biased towards one specific supply chain model and dismisses others without proper evaluation.”
- Speaker Notes: Elaborate on any biases or weak arguments within the article. Use outside sources to substantiate your analysis.

Step 8: Outside Sources to Support Your Analysis

Slide: Provide outside sources that support your analysis and critique of the article.
- Example: “Other authors like [Author] in their 2023 paper also question the feasibility of the author’s suggested model for logistics management.”
- Speaker Notes: Discuss how these external sources either reinforce or challenge the claims in the article you’re reviewing.

Step 9: What Are Others Saying About the Same Topic?

Slide: Present perspectives from other authors or articles on the same topic.
- Example: “A recent study by [Author] (2022) presents a contrasting view to the thesis of the article, emphasizing alternative methods for improving supply chain management.”
Speaker Notes: Expand on these perspectives, explaining whether they support or challenge the article you’re evaluating.

Step 10: Conclusions

Slide: Summarize your critical evaluation of the article.
- Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the author’s thesis based on your analysis.
- Final thoughts: Mention the article’s impact on the profession and any potential areas for future research.
- Speaker Notes: Provide a deeper reflection on your final thoughts about the article, including your overall assessment.

Step 11: References Slide

Slide: List all the references you used in your analysis.
- Ensure you are using APA 7th edition format for all citations.
- Include both the article being reviewed and any other sources you’ve used in your analysis.

Formatting Tips:

Use bullet points for the main points on the slides. This helps your audience quickly grasp the key points.
Speaker notes should provide the full context and explanation that you would discuss in person. Think of these as the script for your oral presentation.
Be concise in your slides but make sure your speaker notes provide sufficient details and elaboration.
Keep your slides visually engaging but avoid overwhelming your audience with too much text.
Ensure your PowerPoint presentation has 15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).

By following this guide, you’ll be able to create a well-structured, critical, and scholarly presentation. Would you like more help with finding peer-reviewed articles or citations?

The post Business Finance – Management appeared first on Skilled Papers.