Sample Answer for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2 Included After Question
According to the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) that informs us about the nature of God, where would you find comfort and hope in the midst of sickness and disease?
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references cited using APA format. Responses to peers or faculty should be 100-150 words and include one reference. Refer to the “Discussion Question Rubric” and “Participation Rubric,” located in Class Resources, to understand the expectations for initial discussion question posts and participation posts, respectively.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
Title: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
We’ve spent some great time first looking at the four principles, and then looking at suffering in the Biblical narrative.
When it comes to our four principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficience, and justice, we seem pretty set on autonomy being #1; in many regards, this is not a surprise, because our class hails primarily from America, and Americans are known for being very protective of their liberty and personal autonomy. A few of us saw otherwise–and I want to say thank you for diversifying our discussion by bringing up some great points.
A concluding thought I have on DQ #1 is simply this: as good as these four values are, is it really possible to separate them? Isn’t letting the patient decide both allowing autonomy and giving the patient justice? Could beneficience and non-maleficence be just two sides of the same coin, and could either be practiced without a sense of justice? Just thinking out loud here; these four principles may be more tied together than we have realized.
Here in DQ #2 we have done well relating the Biblical narrative of creation, fall, redemption, and restoration to how the world works in general and applies to the medical field in particular. Moreover, many of you noticed the perhaps uncomfortable connection/tension between the fall being the source of evil, and the issue of whether or not the Fall makes us personally responsible for our sicknesses (since, after all, we invited sickness in with the Fall).
This has been a really nice tie-in, albeit unplanned, to the little devotional series I started this week on Job and its different reasons for why we suffer. If this interests you, I encourage you to check the devotional announcements out.
As we look ahead to the next week, we’re going to keep moving forward, this time into the subject of death and dying. This is a smooth transition, in some ways, because death is the culmination as well as the end of suffering for someone who is medically ill. We’ll be discussing our personal experiences with death, as well as in what ways we should view death from a philosophical and medical perspective.
Keep up the great work! Thank you for your robust discussions.
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
Title: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
Autonomy in health care should be allowed in healthcare, and some form of it has existed since 1976. Since the initial hospital rules on the granting of orders to refrain from resuscitation were documented, patients have been allowed to decide what life-saving procedures they will allow and which they will deny. Depending on patients’ spiritual beliefs and the patient’s consent or directive when death is upon them, I disagree with physician-assisted euthanasia.
I think that patients should be kept comfortable and pain-free; choosing to die is playing God, and in my opinion, it is not right. Just a little over 30 years ago, in 1990–1997, autonomy had to be curtailed due to assisted euthanasia, as with the cases of Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, back when Dr. Kevorkian was charged and jailed. The Bible says, “Intentionally taking the life of another human being is murder, which the Lord condemns.” Moreover, the Christian worldview says that suicide is a sin against God and others, an ideology I agree with.
Resource:
Simpson, K. (2017). Herb Myers found a steep learning curve ahead after his wife asked to die peacefully. Getting to Say Goodbye: An Aurora couple’s struggle to employ Colorado’s new aid-to-dying law. The Denver Post. https://www.denverpost.com/2017/04/02/getting-to-goodbye-an-aurora-couples-struggle-to-employ-colorados-new-aid-in-dying-law/.
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
Title: PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 2
In my opinion legalizing the decision to end one’s life is like legally approving suicide. This completely removes the ethical and moral protection on life and undermines its sanctity hence autonomy should be limited. People may decide to end their life for the wrong reasons such that when they are prevented from doing so, these persons will live appreciate the fact that they were saved from death and regret their actions and unthoughtful decision to die.
Autonomy in healthcare should extend to individuals’ right to make decisions about their own lives, including choices about medical treatments. However, the question of autonomy in end-of-life decisions, such as the choice to die, is complex and raises ethical, legal, and religious considerations. While respecting individual autonomy, society must carefully balance it with the protection of vulnerable populations and ethical guidelines. (Smith, 2018).
The Bible offers diverse perspectives on life and death, emphasizing the sanctity of life but also acknowledging the human experience of suffering. Interpretations vary, and discussions around autonomy in healthcare should engage in a thoughtful dialogue that considers both secular and religious viewpoints. Striking a balance between autonomy and ethical boundaries is crucial to ensure compassionate care while respecting individual values.
Reference:
Smith, K. A. (2018). Autonomy, consent, and medical decision making. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/autonomy-medical/#PatRigAut