DNP Project III: Section 1 Analysis
Completion of this assignment will result in a contribution to the final DNP project proposal. During designated weeks, sections of the project
will be submitted in their final form. The student will receive feedback up to a total of 2 times for each section prior to final submission of that
section. If the submitted work does not require further revision after the first or second submission, these attempts will be graded,
respectively. On the third submission of each section, it will be considered a final submission and will be graded accordingly based on the
following rubric. The student must achieve a passing grade (minimum 83%) in DNP Project III.
Criterion Excellent
(100-93%)
Proficient (92-
87%)
Meets
Standards
(86-83%)
Needs
Improvement
(82-75%)
Unsatisfactory
(75% or less)
Analysis of Results
(140 points)
Analysis of the data
collected is highly
appropriate and
organized in a way
that is easily
understandable. Data
analysis techniques
chosen are
appropriate for the
project design. All
appropriate
assumptions are
checked for each
test, and violations
are handled
accordingly.
Interpretation of the
results is accurate,
and all pertinent
information is
presented in a
narrative format.
Tables and figures
are used where
appropriate to
enhance viewing of
Analysis of the
data collected is
appropriate and
organized in a way
that is
understandable.
Data analysis
techniques chosen
are appropriate for
the project design.
Appropriate
assumptions are
checked for each
test, and violations
are handled
accordingly.
Interpretation of
the results is
accurate, and
pertinent
information is
presented in a
narrative format.
Tables and figures
Analysis of the
data collected is
appropriate and
organized in a
way that is
understandable.
Data analysis
techniques
chosen are
appropriate for
the project
design.
Appropriate
assumptions are
checked for each
test, and
violations are
handled
accordingly.
Interpretation of
the results is
accurate, and
pertinent
information is
Analysis of the data
collected is
inappropriate and/or
disorganized.. Data
analysis techniques
chosen were
appropriate for the
project design.
Appropriate
assumptions were not
checked for each test,
and violations were
not handled
accordingly.
Interpretation of the
results was inaccurate,
and pertinent
information was not
presented
appropriately. Analysis
was not conducted in a
way that was
consistent with the
project objectives
Analysis of the data
collected is poorly
developed or not
developed at all.
data trends. Analysis
was conducted in a
way that was highly
consistent with the
project objectives
and/or question(s),
and served to
address and/or
answer them.
are used where
appropriate to
enhance viewing of
data trends.
Analysis was
conducted in a way
that was consistent
with the project
objectives and/or
question(s), and
served to address
and/or answer
them. There are 1-
2 areas requiring
further
clarification.
presented in a
narrative format.
Tables and
figures are used
where
appropriate to
enhance viewing
of data trends.
Analysis was
conducted in a
way that was
consistent with
the project
objectives and/or
question(s), and
served to address
and/or answer
them. There are
3-4 areas
requiring further
clarification.
and/or question(s),
and did not serve to
address and/or answer
them. There are 5-6
areas requiring further
clarification..
Organization
(20 points)
Concise and wellorganized writing.
Ideas are described
clearly and are
presented in a logical
sequence.
Ideas and arguments
are fully supported and
developed through
evidence.
Clear organization of
main points.
Ideas are described
clearly and are
presented in a logical
sequence.
Support and
development of ideas is
present but one or
more areas lack
evidence.
Clear organization of
main points but some
areas may stray from
logical sequence.
Support of ideas
present but is not
consistent.
Use of headings is not
consistent.
Minimal paragraph
structure issues.
Writing lacks logical
organization.
Poorly organized, ideas
are not developed
adequately in the paper
and lack unity.
Paragraphs headings
are not used
appropriately.
Major paragraph
structure issues.
Does not meet
basic writing
standards of
organization.
Headings are used
appropriately to
indicate new content
areas.
Headings are used
appropriately to
indicate new content
areas.
Paragraph structure is
appropriate with logical
transitions.
Writing Style
(20 points)
Sentence structure
clear, with smooth
transitions, correct
grammar and
punctuation. No
spelling errors. Uses
standard English
language.
Word choice is correct,
precise and
unambiguous.
Introduction has a clear
statement addressing
the topic.
Body paragraphs have
topic sentences that are
logical and fully
developed.
Overall sentence
structure is clear, with
smooth transitions
Less than 3 grammar,
punctuation or spelling
errors.
Introduction has a clear
statement addressing
the topic.
Body paragraphs have
topic sentences that are
logical and fully
developed.
Paragraph structure is
appropriate with logical
transitions.
Writing does not reveal
discriminatory bias.
Overall sentence
structure is clear, with
smooth transitions
Less than 5 grammar,
punctuation or spelling
errors.
Introduction has a clear
statement addressing
the topic.
Minimal paragraph
structure issues.
Transitions evident but
not used throughout
Writing does not reveal
discriminatory bias.
Spelling, punctuation,
and grammatical errors
create distraction,
making reading difficult;
fragments, comma
splices, run-ons evident.
Errors are frequent.
Clear bias is evident.
Ideas lack unity
Writing style does
not meet basic
standards for
English language.
Paragraph structure is
appropriate with logical
transitions.
Writing does not reveal
discriminatory bias.
Unity of the paper
clearly leads the reader
to the conclusion and
stirs thought regarding
the topic.
Unity of the paper
clearly leads the reader
to the conclusion.
APA
(20 points)
References are current
and are cited
appropriately
throughout paper.
Paper is formatted per
APA style guide with no
APA errors.
References are current
and are cited
appropriately
throughout paper.
Paper is formatted per
APA style guide with
less than 3 APA errors.
References are current
and are cited
appropriately
throughout paper.
Paper is formatted per
APA style guide with
less than 5 APA errors.
References are not
current and/ or are not
appropriately cited.
Paper is not consistent
with APA formatting
guide.
There is evidence of
plagiarism.
APA standards
grossly not met.
Total points
200
—
Section 1 of the DNP Project III: Analysis
A contribution to the final DNP project proposal will be made as a result of the completion of this assignment. Sections of the project will be completed and submitted in their final form during the allocated weeks. The student will receive feedback on each component up to a total of two times before submitting the final version of that section to the instructor. Providing that the submitted work does not require further editing after the first or second submission, the first and second submissions will be graded as successful attempts. It will be deemed a final submission for each area on the third submission, and it will be scored accordingly according to the criteria provided below. Students must earn a passing mark (minimum 83 percent) in DNP Project III in order to graduate.
Excellent in all respects (100-93 percent )
Proficient (92-87 percent proficiency)
It complies with the requirements (86-83 percent )
Improvement is required (82-75 percent )
Unsatisfactory results (75 percent or less)
Conclusions and Recommendations (140 points)
The data collected has been analyzed in an appropriate manner and has been structured in a way that is easily understood. The data analysis methodologies that were used are appropriate for the project’s overall design. For each test, all necessary assumptions are checked, and any violations are dealt with in the right manner.
This report contains an accurate interpretation of the results and all essential information is given in a narrative fashion.
Tables and figures are used when suitable to improve the readability of the text.
The data collected has been analyzed in an appropriate manner and has been structured in a comprehensible manner.
The data analysis methodologies that have been chosen are appropriate for the project’s overall design.
For each test, the assumptions are reviewed to ensure that they are correct, and any breaches are dealt with appropriately.
A clear and correct interpretation of the data is provided, and essential information is presented in an organized narrative fashion.
Tables and figures are included.
The data collected has been analyzed in an appropriate manner and has been structured in a comprehensible manner.
The data analysis methodologies that were used are appropriate for the project’s overall design.
For each test, the assumptions are reviewed to ensure that they are correct, and any breaches are dealt with appropriately.
The results have been correctly interpreted, and all essential information has been provided
The data collected has been analyzed in an incorrect and/or disorganized manner. The data analysis methodologies that were used were appropriate for the project’s design requirements.
For each test, the appropriate assumptions were not validated, and violations were not dealt with in the appropriate manner.
The results were incorrectly interpreted, and essential information was not presented in an appropriate manner. The analysis was not carried out in a manner that was consistent with the project’s goals.
The analysis of the data collected is either inadequately developed or completely lacking.
Data patterns are being observed. The analysis was carried out in a manner that was highly compatible with the project objectives and/or question(s), and it served to address and/or answer those objectives and/or question(s).
are employed when it is necessary to improve the visibility of data trends.
The analysis was carried out in a manner that was compatible with the project objectives and/or question(s), and it served to address and/or answer those objectives and/or question(s). There are one or two places that require additional clarity.
provided in the form of a tale.
Tables and figures are utilized where suitable to aid in the visual presentation of data patterns.
The analysis was carried out in a manner that was compatible with the project objectives and/or question(s), and it served to address and/or answer those objectives and/or question(s). There are three or four areas that require further elucidation.
as well as any question(s), and did not serve to address and/or answer any of them There are perhaps 5-6 areas that require further elucidation.
Organizing a business (20 points)
Writing that is concise and well-organized.
Arguments and ideas are thoroughly supported and developed through the use of evidence, which is provided in a logical sequence and is stated clearly.
The key points are organized in a logical manner.
Ideas are described in detail and presented in a logical sequence in this section.
Although there is support and growth of concepts, there is a lack of proof in one or more areas.
Although there is a clear organization of the essential principles, some regions may deviate from the logical sequence.
Although there is support for concepts, it is not consistent.
The use of headings is not uniform across the document.
There are only minor flaws with the paragraph structure.
Writing does not follow a logical structure.
Papers that are poorly ordered, in which ideas are not sufficiently developed, and that lack coherence.
The heads of paragraphs are not used properly.
There are major problems with the paragraph structure.
It does not adhere to the fundamental writing principles of organization.
Headings are used correctly to denote the beginning of new content sections.
Headings are used correctly to denote the beginning of new content sections.
When dealing with logical transitions, paragraph form is acceptable.
Using a Formal Writing Style (20 points)
The sentence structure is clear, with smooth transitions and precise language and punctuation, and the transitions are fluid. There are no grammatical errors. The language used is ordinary English.
The choice of words is accurate, exact, and unambiguous.
The topic is addressed directly in the introduction’s unambiguous statement.
Each body paragraph begins with a topic statement that is both logical and fully developed.
The overall sentence structure is obvious, and the transitions are fluid.
There are no more than three grammar, punctuation, or spelling problems.
The topic is addressed directly in the introduction’s unambiguous statement.
Each body paragraph begins with a topic statement that is both logical and fully developed.
When dealing with logical transitions, paragraph form is acceptable.
Discriminatory prejudice is not revealed through writing.
The overall sentence structure is obvious, and the transitions are fluid.
There are no more than five grammar, punctuation, or spelling problems.
The topic is addressed directly in the introduction’s unambiguous statement.
There are only minor flaws with the paragraph structure.
Transitions are visible, however they are not employed throughout.
Discriminatory prejudice is not revealed through writing.
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling problems cause distraction and make reading difficult; fragments, commas splices, and run-on sentences are all visible in the text.
Errors occur on a regular basis.
It is clear that there is a bias.
Ideas are disjointed.
The writing style does not adhere to the fundamental principles of the English language.
When dealing with logical transitions, paragraph form is acceptable.
Discriminatory prejudice is not revealed through writing.
The cohesiveness of the work clearly guides the reader to the conclusion and provokes discussion about the subject matter.
The consistency of the work directs the reader to the conclusion with ease.
APA stands for American Psychological Association (20 points)
Referencing is up to date, and references are properly referenced throughout the work.
The paper is formatted in accordance with the APA style guide and has no APA mistakes.
Referencing is up to date, and references are properly referenced throughout the work.
The paper is formatted in accordance with the APA style standard and has no more than three APA mistakes.
Referencing is up to date, and references are properly referenced throughout the work.
The paper is formatted in accordance with the APA style standard and contains less than five APA mistakes.
References are not up to date and/or are not properly cited in this document.
The paper does not adhere to the APA formatting guidelines.
Plagiarism has been proven in this case.
APA standards have been flagrantly violated.
There are a total of 200 points.
The post DNP Project III: Section 1 Analysis appeared first on Research Quora.