StudyHub

Individual Assignment – (2500 words – 50%) – Student’s name:                                                                                             Final Grade:  WeightingHD (Range: 85% to 100%)D (Range: 75% to 84%)  C (Range: 65% to 74%)P (Range: 50% to 64%)Fail (Range: 0 to 49%)Presentation Structure, style, grammar, fluency and effective communication of issues, findings and conclusions 15 marksReport set out in an expert and scholarly manner Superior skill demonstrated in use of correct referencing style (Swinburne Harvard)Proficient in paraphrasing key comments and sparing use of direct quotationsReport set out in a professional mannerHigh level of skill demonstrated in use of correct referencing style (Swinburne Harvard)Paraphrased key comments and used sparinglyReport set out in a good and  acceptable mannerAppropriate use of correct referencing style (Swinburne Harvard)Direct quotations used sparinglyReport set out in fair mannerSome inaccuracies in use of correct referencing style (Swinburne Harvard)Quotations used frequentlyPresentation poorly set outReferencing is either insufficient or contains significant inaccuraciesQuotations over-used, not used or used incorrectlyUnderstanding Demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topic15 marksExpert demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topicSuperior understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topic  Demonstrated appropriate understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topicLimited demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topicMinimum or no demonstrated understanding of concepts and issues relevant to the discussion topicScholarship Evidence of ability to research, analyse and critique issues relevant to the discussion topicAcademically rigorous use of supporting references and course content5 marksExpert demonstrated use of research and critical analysis skills to address discussion topicAcademically rigorous and expert use of appropriate supporting references and course contentUnique insights into theory and applicationSuperior use of research and critical analysis skills to address discussion topicSuperior usage of appropriate supporting references and course contentAppropriate use of research and critical analysis skills to address discussion topicAppropriate usage of supporting references and course contentLimited evidence of research and critical analysis skills usage to address discussion topicLimited usage or some incorrect usage of supporting references and course contentNo evidence or very weak evidence of research and critical analysis skills usage to address discussion topicFew, if any, supporting references and course content WeightingHD (Range: 85% to 100%)D (Range: 75% to 84%)  C (Range: 65% to 74%)P (Range: 50% to 64%)Fail (Range: 0 to 49%)Adherence to assessment tasks and content coverage 10 marksExpert identification and meeting of assessment task requirementsSuperior identification and meeting of assessment task requirementsSome clear evidence of the identification and meeting go assessment requirementsLimited evidence of the identification and meeting go assessment requirementsMinimum or no clear evidence of understanding of and meeting of assessment requirementsCreative and innovative approaches to task Appropriateness of suggested solutions based on evidence provided5 marksExpert, creative and innovative approaches to task completionHighly appropriate solutionsSuperior, creative and innovative approaches to task completionReasonably strong solutionsSome evidence of creative and innovative approaches being used to complete task Adequate solutionsLimited evidence of creative and innovative approaches to task completionSolutions weak but not significantly flawedNo or little demonstration of any creative and innovative approaches to task completionHighly inappropriate solutions Comments:

Expert Help With This Assignment — On Your Terms