Create a matrix or chart that demonstrates 8-10 teaching strategies for vocabulary development. Include:
1. The vocabulary strategies
2. Informal assessments to measure learning for each strategy
3. How to differentiate for ELL or special needs students
Atleast 3 peer reviewed articles
Vocabulary Development
|
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3
Satisfactory 75.00% |
4
Good 85.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
100.0 %
Vocabulary Development Rubric |
||||||
|
45.0 %
Chart/Matrix |
Chart/matrix is missing the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary.
|
Chart/matrix contains some of the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are incomplete.
|
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete and coherent.
|
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete, clear, coherent, and cohesive.
|
Chart/matrix contains the strategies and assessments for teaching vocabulary. Strategies and assessments are complete, clear, coherent, and cohesive. Higher-order thinking is evident.
|
|
|
25.0 %
Technical Requirements: Number of teaching strategies and assessments |
Fewer than six strategies and related assessments are present.
|
Six or seven strategies and assessments are present.
|
At least eight strategies and assessments are present.
|
Nine or ten strategies and assessments are present.
|
More than 10 strategies and assessments are present.
|
|
|
10.0 %
Research |
No outside sources are used to support the assignment.
|
Few outside sources are used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.
|
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality, and/or timeliness.
|
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
|
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
|
|
|
5.0 %
Presentation |
The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.
|
The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.
|
The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.
|
The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.
|
The work is well-presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
|
|
|
10.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
|
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
5.0 %
Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting are appropriate to assignment and style) |
No references page and no citations are included.
|
References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used.
|
References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
References page is inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
|
In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.
|
|
|
100 %
Total Weightage |
||||||
The post development 1629481 2 appeared first on BlueOrigin EssayWriters.
