PHHE 469 Prescott College Performance Measurement Data Worksheet
Question 1 0/1 Performance measurement is defined as the ongoing reporting of program accomplishments EXCEPT for which of the following: Incorrect (C) impact is correct Hide other options a A outputs (efficiency) B) quality с impact Correct answer D) outcomes (effectiveness) Question 2 1/1 Which answer is NOT part of the components of the program hypothesis? Correct (C) Measurements of services … Show other options Question 3 0/1 Performance measurement can provide information to the most frequently asked questions of stakeholders, including all of the following EXCEPT X Incorrect (B) program design is correct Hide other options A A how much product or service (output) does the program provide B) program design Correct answer C) what is the quality (quality outputs) D what outcomes (intermediate and final) does the program provide Question 4 0/1 Evaluation of a program, by necessity takes place at the end of a program because the data are collected for evaluation. Incorrect The statement is false Question 5 1/1 Which of the following are NOT included in the description of “inputs”: Correct (D) description of the … Show other options Question 6 1/1 Impact data provide feedback on the most difficult assessment question of all. What happened to clients as a result of participation in a program that would not have happened in the program’s absence? Which of the following strategies is NOT of part of that determination? Correct (C) Analysis of client… Show other options Question 7 0/1 Which of the answers below is NOT part of a mission statement? Incorrect (D) Description of the … is correct Hide other options A) The organization’s vision Collaboration between organization and the target population C) What might be achieved by the human service organization D Description of the organization’s programs Correct answer Question 8 0/1 Question 8 0/1 Program hypothesis is a term used to sum up all EXCEPT which of the following answers: X Incorrect (A) program components is correct Hide other options a A program components Correct answer B) assumptions C) expectations D etiology Question 9 0/1 Well written process objectives require five components. Which of the following is NOT one of the required objectives? x Incorrect (A) The rationale for the … is correct Hide other options A) The rationale for the proposed program Correct answer B Time frame C) Result D Criteria for measurement Question 13 0/1 A one-size-fits-all approach to program design is viable for many types of services Incorrect The statement is false Question 14 1/1 One approach to data collection is to structure it around program objectives including all EXCEPT which of the following: Correct (A) emerging issues of … Show other options Question 15 1/1 A program planner’s function is to design a program that is all of the following EXCEPT: Correct (C) builds on existing … Show other options Question 16 0/1 Which of the statements below is NOT correct? Incorrect (D) Effectiveness-based … is correct Hide other options a A Performance measurement uses program data for external reporting purposes Monitoring uses program data during implementation for management purposes C Program evaluation uses program data after implementation for policy and planning purposes D Effectiveness-based program planning is used to determine efficiency Correct answer Question 18 0/1 In the planning phase, what we hope to achieve needs to be included, but measurement criteria comes later in the process. Incorrect The statement is false Question 19 0/1 Tables are one way to show a picture of data in columns and row that can easily be understood. All of following are examples of labels included in a table EXCEPT: X Incorrect (D) qualitative data is correct Hide other options A A data elements B data aggregation C data disaggregation qualitative data Correct answer
Grid View
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Main Posting
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
First Response
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100
